0

Aston Martin DBS Ultimate

  1. Aston Martin DBS Ultimate
  2. Aston Martin DBS Ultimate
  3. Aston Martin DBS Ultimate
  4. Aston Martin DBS Ultimate
  5. Aston Martin DBS Ultimate
  6. Aston Martin DBS Ultimate

Just the Facts:

  • The new Aston Martin DBS Ultimate debuts this week — on the company’s Web site and Facebook page.
  • The limited-edition DBS Ultimate is offered as a coupe and a Volante convertible.
  • The DBS Ultimate can be ordered with a manual or automatic transmission.


GAYDON, England — The new Aston Martin DBS Ultimate debuts this week — on the company’s Web site and Facebook page.

The Ultimate is described as “a new and unique limited edition” of the DBS. Offered as a coupe and a Volante convertible, the DBS Ultimate comes in a choice of three exclusive exterior colors — Carbon Black II, Quantum Silver and Silver Fox.

Aston plans to make only 100 copies, for delivery in late 2012.

Among the Ultimate’s distinctive exterior features: Carbon-fiber mirrors, dark grille, smoked taillamps, Zircotec-coated exhaust pipes and brake calipers painted red, yellow or black.

Interior highlights include diamond quilt stitching on the leather seats and Alcantara headliner, embroidered headrests and leather-trimmed gearshift paddles finished in Spicy Red.

The DBS Ultimate’s 6.0-liter V12 can be equipped with either six-speed manual or automatic transmission.

No word yet on pricing or availability.

Inside Line says: Look for stickers just north of $300,000.

Continue Reading »

0

Climbing gas prices have made fuel efficiency a priority for many shoppers. If you’re in the market for a sedan that has a light touch at the pump, you’ll want to consider the 11 models listed below (the list contains more than our usual 10 picks due to ties). These are the most frugal picks in the segment.

Not surprisingly, hybrids have a strong presence on this list. Family-sedan shoppers can choose from models like the Toyota Camry Hybrid, the Ford Fusion Hybrid and the Hyundai Sonata Hybrid. Those seeking something more luxurious can opt for the Lexus HS 250h, while Volkswagen’s Passat Diesel and Jetta Diesel are available for those who want a diesel-powered alternative. There are some compact and subcompact sedans on the list, too, such as the Honda Civic, Hyundai Accent and Kia Rio.
One model that isn’t included is the Toyota Prius. The reason is that the car’s useful rear hatch makes it more of a hatchback than a wagon. The Prius makes an appearance on our “Top 10 Most Fuel-Efficient Hatchbacks and Wagons” list.

Our rankings are based on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) miles-per-gallon ratings for city and highway travel. We tapped the EPA’s combined fuel economy formula: 55 percent of city mpg rating plus 45 percent of highway mpg rating. The rating for each vehicle below is expressed in mpg as a city/highway/combined ratio.

  1. Honda Civic Hybrid

    1. Honda Civic Hybrid — 44/44/44

  2. Toyota Camry Hybrid

    2. Toyota Camry Hybrid — 43/39/41

  3. Ford Fusion Hybrid

    3. Ford Fusion Hybrid — 41/36/39 (tie)

  4. Lincoln MKZ Hybrid

    Lincoln MKZ Hybrid — 41/36/39 (tie)

  5. Hyundai Sonata Hybrid

    4. Hyundai Sonata Hybrid — 35/40/37 (tie)

  6. Kia Optima Hybrid

    Kia Optima Hybrid — 35/40/37 (tie)

  7. Lexus HS 250h

    5. Lexus HS 250h — 35/34/35 (tie)

  8. Volkswagen Passat Diesel

    Volkswagen Passat Diesel — 31/43/35 (tie)

  9. Hyundai Accent

    6. Hyundai Accent — 30/40/34 (tie)

  10. Kia Rio

    Kia Rio — 30/40/34 (tie)

  11. Volkswagen Jetta Diesel

    Volkswagen Jetta Diesel — 30/42/34 (tie)

Continue Reading »

0

Amy Lerner Gazelle Rally

  1. Amy Lerner Gazelle Rally
  2. Gazelle Rally Canyon
  3. Gazelle Winning
  4. Sand Dune Gazelle Rally

Can we who compete for a lane change on a freeway learn about improving fuel economy from a desert rally that takes place in the wastelands of Morocco?

Yes, we can, says Amy Lerner of Alpine, New Jersey, who has competed twice in the Rallye Aicha des Gazelles, which bills itself as the toughest of all sporting events for women. Lerner’s authority comes from experience, since she and driving partner (and sister) Tricia Reina won the rally’s 2012 Logica Challenge for Eco-driving.

“Eco-driving” is a term that describes the energy-efficient use of vehicles. Many carmakers are embracing the idea and providing drivers with tools to measure their driving efficiency, such as Fiat’s Eco:Drive app. The goal is to achieve better fuel economy and lower CO2 emissions. Though vehicle engineering has made great strides in raising fuel economy, drivers can — and do — sabotage fuel economy with bad driving habits and improper vehicle maintenance.

A Different Kind of Racing
In the Gazelle rally, competitors who drive without taking fuel economy into account are penalized. Logica, a technology company in the U.K., measures the eco-efficiency of drivers by installing a device in each competition vehicle that captures information about abrupt acceleration, sudden braking, excessive idling and excessive speed (anything above about 50 mph). All these things are the enemies of eco-driving.

“You don’t have people lane changing and cutting you off in Morocco,” Lerner says. “But all the principles of eco-driving are just sound practices of being a good driver, whether you’re on the shifting sands of the desert or the New Jersey Turnpike. Becoming a good eco-driver doesn’t take much effort. It becomes intuitive very quickly.”

Lerner says the key to eco-driving is anticipating what is up ahead. “Pay attention to your vehicle,” she says. “Hear your engine accelerating without looking at the gauges. Feel acceleration and notice how hard you are braking. Smooth out your driving. Most of all, watch your speed. All the penalty points we racked up in Morocco came from driving too fast.”

Tips for Eco-Driving
Here are some eco-driving techniques from Amy Lerner that can save you money a little bit at a time and a lot over the long haul. As a matter of fact, Edmunds’ own fuel economy tests confirm that several of these suggestions make a useful difference in mpg.

  • Read the road and anticipate traffic flow: Keep your distance to about 3 seconds behind the vehicle ahead of you. This allows you to act instead of react, improves safety and enables steady driving.
  • Observe the speed limit: Assume that every 5 mph you drive over 60 adds 31 cents to a gallon of gasoline. If you keep that in mind and hold down your speed, you can save from 27-89 cents per gallon, according to fueleconomy.gov.
  • Calm down: The combination of speeding, rapid acceleration and harsh braking can lower your gas mileage by 33 percent at highway speeds and by 5 percent around town. By slowing down and smoothing out your driving style, you can save between 19 cents and $1.28 per gallon. (In Edmunds testing, a “calm” driving style improved fuel economy by an average of 35 percent in highway driving.) Use cruise control to maintain a steady speed on lightly traveled highways as well as freeways.
  • Upshift sooner: If you’re in a car with a manual transmission or an automatic that has a manual-shift mode, pay attention to when you shift. Driving at high rpm or even medium-high rpm always consumes more fuel than driving at low rpm. Get up to speed quickly (even skipping a gear now and then) and maintain your speed. Shift to a higher gear at approximately 2,000 rpm, always prioritizing safety by minding traffic situations and vehicle specifics first.

Stop Idling
Lerner reports that minimizing the amount of time the engine idles makes a very significant contribution to better mpg. “Even before the Gazelle, it drove my husband crazy that I always shut off the engine if we stopped,” Lerner says. “But now I’m vindicated.”

  • Stop the engine if you are going to be stopped for more than a minute. Idling can use a quarter to a half a tank of gas per hour, depending on the engine size and whether the air-conditioner is in use. Not idling can save between 1 and 4 cents per minute.

“Turn off the engine in situations that you can regulate,” Lerner says. People don’t turn their engines off at a long red light, but that is a situation where you can, she adds. Many other situations, such as waiting in a line to make a left turn, are not as conducive to a manual engine shut-off. In its own testing, Edmunds has found that drivers can improve fuel economy by 19 percent if they cut out excessive idling.

Soon, drivers won’t even have to think about turning off the engine. Start/stop technology, which automatically shuts down the engine when a vehicle stops, is quickly becoming commonplace.

For 2012, 46 models from makers have start/stop systems, according to Edmunds data. By 2016, 40 percent of new vehicles built in the United States will include the systems, according to Johnson Controls Inc., a supplier of start/stop batteries. Start/stop can achieve fuel economy improvements of 5-12 percent in new vehicles, Johnson Controls estimates.

Help Your Car Help You

  • Check tire pressure: At least once a month and before driving at high speeds or on long trips, check to make sure that your tires are inflated to the correct tire pressure. Typically, passenger car tires can lose about 1 pound-per-square-inch (PSI) per month, according to tire manufacturer Michelin. Tires that are not properly inflated create more rolling resistance and cost you money at the pump.
  • Do your maintenance: Service your vehicle regularly in order to maintain energy efficiency and make sure you’re using the prescribed engine oil.
  • Be efficient around town: Leave on time and know where you are going. Bundle and route your errands to avoid gas-wasting backtracks.

Prepare for road trips: Remove roof racks and boxes when you don’t need them. They can drag down your fuel economy by 21 percent, Edmunds testing has found. Also take the junk out of your car. An extra 100 pounds in your vehicle could reduce your mpg by up to 2 percent, according to fueleconomy.gov.

“We won the Logica challenge by using our heads, maintaining our speed, planning our trip and adopting good driving practices,” Lerner says. “We took it slow and steady. And it paid off.”

Continue Reading »

0

1996 Lexus ES 300

  1. 1996 Lexus ES 300
  2. 1996 Lexus ES 300
  3. 1996 Lexus ES 300
  4. Used Car Dealership
  5. 1994 Toyota Camry

A recent study by ICF International, commissioned by Ways to Work, concluded that struggling families who have access to an affordable vehicle are 82 percent more likely to get off public assistance programs.

Unfortunately, many people in that situation assume a reliable and affordable used car is out of reach or can only be bought at a dealership. And if they have bad credit, which people with strapped budgets often do, they may believe they have no choice but to use a dealership’s own car-financing plans.

That’s where the trouble can begin. Some dealerships, known as Buy Here, Pay Here lots, charge interest rates that approach the state maximums. In one instance recounted by the Los Angeles Times, a woman made a down payment of $3,000 on a 2007 Ford Focus and had monthly payments of $387, reflecting a 20.7 percent interest rate.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Or does it? To find out we went car shopping.

Setting a Target Price
As we researched other Buy Here, Pay Here transactions, we saw that many other buyers made down payments in the $3,000 range as well. Based on that, we decided to pay no more than $3,500 for our used car, including taxes and fees. And we wanted a car with no more than 165,000 miles on it.

If someone told you that he’d bought a used car for less than $3,500, how would you picture it? You’d probably visualize a beater with mismatched doors and torn seats, riding on wheels that were missing hubcaps. Such is the stigma attached to cars in this price range. And it’s this stereotype that leads many people to purchase cars that they may not be able to afford.

But we were determined not to buy a beater. We wanted a car we would not be ashamed to drive. After two weeks of Internet research and test-drives, we went a little over budget and spent $3,800 for a 1996 Lexus ES 300 that we found at an independent used car lot in Pasadena, California.

Over the next year, we will track the car’s fuel, maintenance and repair costs, not to mention our experiences while driving the car on a daily basis. We’ll drive to and from work, run errands around town and take cross-country trips. Our goal is to keep the car for one year and drive it 15,000 miles, which is about what the average person drives in a year.

In monthly feature stories and in our long-term test blog, we’ll describe what we’re doing and what we’re learning. The goal is to help you see that it’s possible to get the transportation you need without risking financial security under the threat of high monthly payments and ridiculous interest rates. This is our Year of Debt-Free Driving.

Shopping With the Internet
To find our car we used three popular online search tools: AutoTrader, eBay Motors and Craigslist. At the outset, we had only a price in mind and used this as the basis for the search. But it gave us too many results and we quickly realized we needed to refine the search criteria.

The best way to get a list of viable candidates from an Internet search is to set up a few parameters. For this debt-free car project, we searched for used cars with a maximum price of $4,500 — $1,000 over our top price. We included these pricier cars in the hopes that the owners would come down during our negotiations.

Most of the Web sites we visited have search engines that let you narrow down your choices by year, price and model. We had a model-year range of 1993-2008 and set our sights on a few models (and brands) that have a reputation for reliability. We searched for Honda Accords, Honda Civics, Toyota Camrys and Toyota Corollas. But we quickly learned that this reputation for reliability comes at a cost. The majority of the Hondas were pricey, roughly $1,000 more than a non-Honda with similar mileage. And their mileage was above our 165,000-mile ceiling.

This meant we had to open up our search. We hunted around for the sort of car that might have been overlooked by the crowd — something that was reliable, but from a lesser-known brand. We looked at cars from Infiniti, Lexus, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Subaru and Volvo.

We then bought a $45, 30-day subscription to Experian’s AutoCheck.com, a report service that provides vehicle history. AutoCheck allowed us to run an unlimited number of vehicle history reports on cars that caught our attention. The reports provided a quick, helpful first pass through the selection that we used to weed out any cars with issues, such as those with salvage titles or cars that had been in accidents. To use vehicle-history report services, you have to have a vehicle identification number (VIN). Not every listing on a car-sale Web site shows them, so in those cases, we called the owner and asked for the VIN.

Pricing Variation
Next, we compared the asking prices of the cars with their value according to Edmunds True Market Value (TMV®). And we saw a huge variation.

There were a couple of factors at work in the discrepancy we saw between TMV and real-world prices. First, not everyone uses TMV as a pricing guide. For example, other pricing guides have rosier pricing that tends to favor the seller.

Second, we also realized that in this low, low price range, the market value of cars meant little to independent used-car dealers. They often set the price based on what they paid for the car at auction and what they spent to recondition it.

Once we knew that a car on our short list had a clean vehicle history report, we called the seller. We wanted to verify that the car was still available and ask a few basic questions. Our used car worksheet reminded us of what to ask and helped us get the information organized.

Kicking Tires
We replied to both dealer and private-party for-sale listings. In general, we recommend dealing with car owners rather than car dealers, since private-party sellers are easier to negotiate with and will know more about the car’s past. But don’t be afraid to consider a dealership. After all, that’s where we ultimately found our car. And since you are paying cash for the car, you won’t have to worry about a finance officer in some high-pressure dealership leading you into a bad deal.

About a week into our research and some wacky experiences with a curb stoner and some sellers who turned out to be Internet scammers, we encountered a car that we could take seriously: a forest-green 1996 Lexus ES 300 with 135,000 miles on the odometer. It looked good in the photos and the vehicle history report showed a clean record. There had been no accidents on record and the car had made multiple service visits to a Lexus dealer.

A tiny independent dealership was selling the Lexus. Its sole signage consisted of a vinyl banner on a chain-link fence. We found the Lexus covered in a layer of dust and boxed in by the roughly 10 cars that made up the rest of the dealer’s inventory. The car was slow to start and smelled like oil when we fired it up.

The salesman, Fred, said the smell was not a problem. A valve cover gasket had recently been changed and some oil had leaked onto the exhaust manifold. We could see that the car’s body was in great shape and the seats had normal wear for a vehicle of this age.

“What price do we have on this car?” Fred asked us. It was an odd question for a seller to put to a buyer. The AutoTrader ad said $3,995, but the dealer’s own Web page had it listed for $3,700. And that’s the price we told him. He seemed satisfied with our answer and never bothered to verify it.

The Lexus was nice, but we didn’t want to jump on the first car we looked at, so we moved on. Next we looked at a pair of Volvos. The one being advertised was out of commission, since it had been used as a loaner and the radiator went bad while it was in use. The second one ran well enough, but the driver seat had a huge tear and there was a white crusty substance on the window switches that looked like dried Bondo body filler.

We continued to shop. And the next few cars we found (including a red Lexus ES 300 almost identical to the green one) were in decent shape, but the salespeople were unwilling to drop the prices into our range. The asking prices were well above TMV, yet the salespeople felt justified in holding the line, because they had invested some money into reconditioning the cars.

After a week and a half of assessing various used cars, the green Lexus was looking better and better.

The Negotiation
We called Fred and made an initial offer of $3,100. “That’s how much we have in the car,” Fred said. He assured us that the car was in “perfect condition,” and that he wanted $3,700.

Then we learned that the dealership could handle the DMV paperwork, which not all small independent dealerships can do. Our discussion shifted to the “out the door” price, which added tax and registration. We made a new offer of $3,700, out the door. Fred countered with $3,900.

We hung up and took a closer look at the numbers. We were able to back-calculate the sales tax and DMV registration and found that the $3,900 out-the-door price wasn’t all that bad. According to our calculations of tax and registration, we’d actually be paying about $3,500 for the car. Keep in mind that these numbers were based on California sales tax and DMV fees.

We were willing to pay the $3,900, but decided we’d make a last-ditch effort to get the price down further. We called Fred back about an hour later. He sounded happy to hear from us. We told him that we had discussed this purchase with our boss (you can substitute “significant other” here during your negotiations), and we were willing to pay $3,800, out the door.

“OK,” he said. “That’s fine. You can have the car for $3,800 out the door.” We discussed a few other details and arranged to pick up the car the next day.

Closing the Deal
As the contracts were being drawn up, we realized that the selling price of the car was actually $3,286.16. After all the number-crunching we had gotten an even better deal than the one we had negotiated. The finance person noticed it, but we were so far into closing the deal that he just chalked it up to his colleagues being absent-minded.

We drove home on pins and needles, wondering if there was anything we might have missed. But there wasn’t. This 1996 Lexus ES 300 started fine the next day and ran smoothly. We breathed a sigh of relief and took a moment to pat ourselves on the back. We had just bought a car for under $3,500 and it wasn’t a beater.

Continue Reading »

0

Pros

Class-leading rear legroom; fuel-efficient; comfortable ride.

Cons

Erratic CVT; cheap seat fabric; exterior door lock only on driver side.

Does a Low Price Mean a Good Buy?

By Ronald Montoya, Consumer Advice Editor


Published: 05/10/2012 

With a base price of $10,990, the 2012 Nissan Versa 1.6 S is the least expensive new car in America. Its roll-up windows, manual door locks and two-speaker sound system are as bare-bones as it gets these days. It’s all you need. Or is it?

The base model of any given vehicle is meant to entice you onto the showroom floor of a car dealership. Maybe you’ve seen such a car in a newspaper ad that carries the headline, “One at This Price!” You can’t help but wonder if less is really more. Intrigued, you visit the dealership, take a look at the car, and just out of curiosity about a few more convenience features, you utter those fateful words, “Can you show me something a little nicer?” And then as usual you buy something a little more expensive than you can afford.

The question is, what kind of car can you get for $11,000? Is it a bargain, real value for money? Or is it a stripped-down shell of disappointment? It’s a very interesting sort of automotive calculus. What do you get in the cheapest car sold in America? And what’s more important, the newness of the car or the quality of the features?

At this price point, you cannot ignore the prospect of a lightly used car, which probably has more features for the same amount of money. In fact, for the same price as a base-model 2012 Nissan Versa 1.6 S, you can get a three-year-old Nissan Sentra with twice the number of standard features. Go back a couple more years and that same $11K can get you the larger and more refined Nissan Altima.

If you’re like 90 percent of the car-buying public, the base price of this 2012 Nissan Versa 1.6 S is a bit deceptive, because chances are, you’ll want an automatic transmission. This is the model we tested and the automatic adds $2,130 to the price tag. Tack on the standard $780 destination fee and suddenly this $11K car is a stone’s throw away from $14,000.

In this revised price range, you are now competing with an impressive class of subcompact vehicles like the sporty 2012 Ford Fiesta, stylish 2012 Kia Rio and the dependable 2012 Toyota Yaris.

Performance

The 2012 Nissan Versa is powered by a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 109 horsepower and 107 pound-feet of torque. In Edmunds instrumented track testing, the Versa went from a standstill to 60 mph in 10.3 seconds. When it comes to braking, the Versa 1.6 S pairs its front disc brakes with rear drum brakes, so the action of the brake pedal feels a little long. The car still came to a stop from 60 mph in 131 feet, which is about average for this class.

Our test model of the 1.6 S was equipped with the optional continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT). In theory, a CVT helps maximize engine efficiency so it gets the most out of a small amount of horsepower. The CVT does a good enough job of driving around town, delivering smooth getaways from stoplights and producing an effortless driving experience. At highway speeds, the transmission will occasionally search for its ideal ratio if you abruptly change the throttle input and you’ll feel as if the power is surging.

Of course, the way in which you’ll best appreciate the CVT’s contribution to efficiency lies in fuel economy. The EPA says that the Versa is capable of an estimated 30 mpg in the city/38 highway and a combined 33 mpg. During our brief time with the vehicle, we recorded a best of 36 mpg and an all-around average of 30 mpg.

As far as handling goes, it’s easy to belittle the soft calibration of the Versa 1.6 S’s suspension and its unfashionable 65-series tires. Yet the Versa is impressively comfortable as a result, and the P185/65R15 Continental ContiProContact tires effectively isolate the cabin from the persistent road harshness that more aggressive tire choices always exhibit. The body rolls a lot in the corners, yet the car always proves predictable, although the cornering limits are not high.

Comfort

The seats of this base model Versa are supportive, although the soft, spongy character of the cushions isn’t to our taste, maybe because we’ve been spoiled by cars at high price points. This car features a six-way manually adjustable driver seat, plus the steering wheel tilts (although it doesn’t telescope), which together improve your ability to find a comfortable driving position even in this basic, bare-bones car.

There’s plenty of room inside the 2012 Nissan Versa, and this is especially true in the rear seat, which offers the most rear legroom among subcompact cars. Parents will be happy to know that they can fit a rear-facing child seat with room to spare — a rare feat in the subcompact class.

The Versa’s engine doesn’t make particularly good noises at full throttle, but its behavior at cruising speed is far more composed. Although you notice more wind and road noise than you expect when the car is accelerating, there’s less noise at cruising speed than you expect.

Function

It’s easy to think that power door locks are a frivolous convenience item, yet this car’s manual door locks were the thing that made the Versa 1.6 S seem cheap every time we drove it. Everyone complained about the manual door locks. And such unhappiness is intensified because the car has just one exterior door lock. The driver door is the only way into the car, and this becomes an obstacle not just for admitting passengers but also for loading gear. You can live with manual locks, but it’s surprisingly annoying to do so.

On the other hand, we were pleased to see that the Versa 1.6 S’s list of standard equipment includes air-conditioning and a good quality audio system. The stereo has only two speakers, but they sound good, and you also have a single-disc CD player and an auxiliary jack for your MP3 player. Of course, you can forget about controls on the steering wheel, not to mention cruise control. And if you need a navigation system, you’ll be shopping for one from your local electronics outlet.

In our real-world usability tests, we found that the 14.8 cubic feet of the Versa’s trunk are enough to accommodate a useful amount of luggage and a bag of golf clubs. At this trim level for the Versa, the rear seat cannot be folded down, which seriously compromises the car’s utility. You get cupholders front and rear, plus bottle holders in the door pockets (a 12-volt power outlet, too), but forget about a remote trunk release.

Design/Fit and Finish

The Nissan Versa sedan was redesigned for 2012, and it shares some styling cues with the forthcoming 2013 Nissan Altima and 2013 Sentra. The Versa certainly has a more upscale look than before.

Inside the car it’s a different story. Although this is far from one of the vinyl-trimmed interiors of the 1970s, the plastic is hard, not soft. The seat upholstery is more like seat covering, and it made us wonder about long-term durability. The instrument display is sparse and plain, although it reminds you that most modern instrumentation is about marketing, not science.

On the whole, the cabin of the Nissan Versa 1.6 S reminds you of a hybrid compact car, not a German sedan. It shows good build quality, but the look is purposely plain and the intention is function, not comfort and convenience.

Who should consider this vehicle

Worry-free practicality is the primary appeal of the 2012 Nissan Versa 1.6 S. It offers perfectly good performance, excellent fuel economy and surprising comfort. It is about transportation, not luxury. A used car might offer a greater level of convenience features, yet the Versa counters with an assured level of reliability and durability, not to mention a warranty to back it up.

The 2012 Nissan Versa 1.6 S demonstrates that cheap cars have come a long way in 20 years. If you need a fuel-efficient commuter car for the lowest price possible, then the Versa 1.6 S can be a good fit. Even so, cars with a greater level of convenience are enticingly close in price to this one, and we came away from the Versa feeling that we could do better. The Nissan Versa 1.6 S is clearly a bargain, but you have to decide if a bargain is really what you want.

Others To Consider
2012 Chevrolet Sonic, 2012 Ford Fiesta, 2012 Kia Rio, 2012 Toyota Yaris

The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

Continue Reading »

0

Bigger, Lighter, Faster: Pick 3

By Mike Magrath, Features Editor


Published: 05/07/2012 

A palm tree whips by on our left side. On our right are the tight folds of a rock-speckled valley. The roof is open in our 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG roadster and the smell of the sea slips into the cabin. We crack off a heavy-throttle upshift just before a silly French hatchback comes understeering into our already too-narrow lane. We’re hard on the brakes to avoid punching a three-pointed star through the wandering subcompact.

Disaster averted, we’re back to enjoying the scenery. It looks familiar but slightly different. The palm trees are shorter and stockier and the sea ahead of us is a milky blue instead of the deep blue-green Pacific we see at home.

This could be Southern California. We could be minutes from home. If we weren’t paying close attention, the roads leading into the Provence-Alpes-Cote d’Azure region of France look like California. And if you’re not paying attention, the 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG looks like a normal SL550.

Stronger and Stiffer, Not Heavier
The 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL63 is based on the new 2013 Mercedes SL550 and thus gets all of the same treatments. The body-in-white of both cars is down by 220 pounds versus the previous model, yet rigidity is up by 20 percent. The latest SL chassis contains some 200 feet of robot welding and nearly 2,000 rivets; the firewall is the largest cast piece in the automotive industry. Stiffness is important when you’ve got a car with 429 horsepower from a twin-turbo V8.

It gets even more important when you, as AMG has done here, rip out that motor and fill the void with a 530-hp 5.5-liter twin-turbo V8 hand built in Affalterbach.

Stiffness is also an issue when that same car doesn’t have a roof. The magnesium power-folding roof is not only very sturdy, it shaves 13 pounds from last year’s steel-framed roof. The old SL would shudder as the mechanisms whirred and the roof origamied itself into place, but there’s none of that here. Hold the button for the top and, like a good stagehand, the SL63 changes the scenery without reminding the audience of the intricacies at play. We said it of the SL550 and we’ll repeat it here: It’s one of the tightest convertibles we’ve ever driven.

With the additional bodywork and larger wheels, Mercedes estimates the SL63 tips the scales at 4,068 pounds — only 100 pounds heavier than the SL550 and nearly 400 pounds lighter than a 2011 SL63 AMG we tested last year.

It All Starts With the Engine
Starting the engine begins with a familiar snarl, but from a different body. Gone is the lustworthy naturally aspirated 6.2-liter V8 from the outgoing SL63 AMG and in its place is a new forced-induction power plant that promises to satisfy our love for power and the government’s love for fuel efficiency.

Tobias Moers, chief engineer at Mercedes AMG, is quick to remind us that this is not the first application of AMG’s new M157 5.5-liter turbocharged V8. It already sits in the E63, S63, CL63 and the CLS63 AMG cars and we’ve had our hands on nearly all of them. As with the S63, the SL63 AMG makes 530 hp and 590 pound-feet of torque in its standard tune.

Mercedes didn’t provide them in their normal state, however. The cars we were driving were equipped with the AMG Performance package — a $9,000 option that “relimits” the top speed to 186 mph, increases power to 557 hp and 664 lb-ft of torque (via cranking the boost to 18.5 psi from 14.2 psi) and adds a limited-slip differential. Equipped with this pack, Mercedes estimates that the SL will hit 60 mph in under 4 seconds.

Controlling the Launch
Achieving this number, however, isn’t as easy as smashing the go pedal and riding the wave of boost. Try it that way and the 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL63 drags itself to about 10 mph before the turbos drop their full payload and the 285/35ZR20s out back scorch the asphalt. Fun, but not fast.

Instead, this SL, like the other AMGs is fitted with a Race Start (RS) feature that manages wheelspin, gearshifts and rpm to get the perfect launch. But it’s a multistep process. Trying to use RS for light-to-light racing is like using an over-under shotgun to mow down zombies; you may get the first few, but eventually you’ll get caught.

On the open road, the twin-turbo V8 has startling midrange. Passing a slow-moving Dacia — and the six cars it’s holding up — is a non-event that requires zero forethought. All of that torque we wanted at launch is available and only too happy to get things moving.

Whether we shift the seven-speed automatic (a wet clutch replaces the torque converter in AMG cars) via the upgraded aluminum paddles or dump it in Sport Plus mode, the shifts are lightning-fast and send just enough shock through the system to make you feel like something happened. Along with the shift comes a distinct pop. Less a pop, per se, than a huff covering a yelp. Sound matters to AMG. Just because they can’t get overrun on deceleration anymore doesn’t mean they can’t make some inappropriate noises.

The ABC of AMG
There are three buttons on the center console next to the shifter in the 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG. The first is the familiar skidding car representing traction control. The third is the AMG button that sets all systems to a preset level of attack. Between them is the familiar graphic of a shock absorber that allows for adjustment of the suspension.

In normal mode, the SL63 glides with the solidity and effortlessness of the megayachts moored in the St. Tropez bay below us. Impacts flow through the suspension and into the cabin to remind us that the car is still connected to the road in the traditional Germanic way. The goal isn’t isolation; it’s control. As the road tightens, the body pitches over in reaction to the precise but finger-light steering.

Press that shock absorber button and the Mercedes-Benz Active Body Control springs into life. Immediately the steering changes. There’s more weight in the wheel and the SL63 is far more reactive. The ratio never changes. Rather, Mercedes simply tinkers with the levels of assist as the ABC adjusts the suspension to simulate a quicker ratio. Turn-in is immediate in this mode and takes some getting used to, as does the ultra-flat cornering.

Peerless?
“There aren’t any,” a representative for Mercedes tells us when we ask about competitors. “Buyers don’t cross-shop the SL.”

According to the company, SL buyers are also, on average, 56 years old, predominantly male (84 percent), college graduates (77 percent), married (75 percent) and earn an average household income of $516,000 per year. Up to 40 percent of these buyers opt for an AMG version.

They’re also repeat Mercedes-Benz buyers and often repeat SL buyers. The 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG is better in every measurable way than its predecessor — something we look forward to proving on our track back home — and Mr. $516,000-per-year will count himself deserving to park one next to his S- or CLS-Class AMG.

We’ll mourn the loss of the naturally aspirated V8. We always liked the way it would pop and burble under engine braking, explode with natural sound on an upshift and fly through its rpm range with a wicked quickness.

Mr. $516,000 will briefly mourn the loss of $181,240 (as tested) and bask in the Mediterranean sun while his car slowly depreciates as he waits to buy the next best SL63 AMG ever.

Edmunds attended a manufacturer-sponsored press event to facilitate this report, which originally appeared on insideline.com.

Continue Reading »

0

2001 Buick Regal GS Fire

  1. 2001 Buick Regal GS Fire
  2. 2003 Buick Regal
  3. NHTSA Administrator David Strickland, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood

In April 2009, General Motors began sending registered letters to owners of more than 1.4 million of its cars equipped with 3.8-liter V6 engines, notifying them of a recall for 1997-2003 V6-equipped Chevrolets, Buicks, Oldsmobiles and Pontiacs to address a potential engine fire hazard. The previous year, the company had sent letters to owners of 207,000 Buicks and Pontiacs with turbocharged versions of the same engine for the same problem.

By the time the 2009 recall was issued, there had been reports filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of almost 250 fires in such cars. The problem was thought to be caused by oil that had spilled or leaked onto heated exhaust manifold surfaces. In some cases, the oil caught fire and the flames spread to plastic parts, including the spark plug wiring channel and the upper intake manifolds and engine covers.

As almost all car-fire warnings do, the letters also urged owners not to park the cars in their garages or near homes or other flammable structures until the recall work had been completed.

But not every owner of a fire-prone GM vehicle has seen that letter. Although the rate of incidents is steadily declining, there have been at least 250 additional engine fires since the recall was announced three years ago, according to reports filed with NHTSA.

In many cases, the owners of the burned-up cars said they were not aware that there had been a recall. Most had purchased the vehicles used. Many didn’t know if the required repair work had ever been done. Some of the cars that were parked in garages are believed in several cases to have caused structural damage or damage to other vehicles as flames spread.

One Man’s Fire
That’s what happened in April to Pete Costello, shortly after he parked his 2001 Buick Regal GS in the garage at the county office building in Elyria, Ohio, where he works as a property assessor.

Costello said he purchased the Buick from a private party in early 2010 and wasn’t told that the car had been recalled but hadn’t been repaired. His father-in-law is a mechanic, so he takes the car to that shop rather than to a GM dealership, where he presumably would have learned of the recall and the repair that his car needed. Franchised dealerships routinely check vehicles for unperformed recall work, in part because they get paid by the automaker to do the repairs.

Just after he’d parked and returned to his office, Costello was summoned to the parking garage, where his car was in flames.

“By the time I got there, the fire department had put out the fire,” he told Edmunds. But by then, the engine cover was melted and the engine was destroyed, he said. Heat from the flames caused minor damage to cars on both sides of Costello’s, but the fire was limited to the Buick.

Costello said he’s debating whether to junk the Buick, but probably will. “I paid $3,000 for it, and I’ve gotten my money’s worth over the two years I’ve owned it,” he said.

He’s also planning on very quickly checking into the status of recalls on his wife’s car, a 2003 Pontiac Grand Prix. That’s another model covered by GM’s engine fire recall.

More than two dozen consumers like Costello have complained on Edmunds forums of car fires that occurred after the launch of the 2009 recall. Like Costello, this forum user’s car also caught fire while parked:

“My 2002 Grand Prix GTP caught on fire in a parking lot while I was in the grocery store two weeks ago,” the forum user wrote. “I had just left work and was on my way home. I’m just thankful my daughter wasn’t in the car with me. I submitted the claim to my insurance company, and they’re totaling it because they can’t find the wiring harness needed to fix it. GM doesn’t make it anymore. I didn’t learn of the recall on my car until after the fire.”

Flaws in the System
What Costello and hundreds of others have experienced points to a major problem in the U.S. vehicle-recall system: There’s no certainty that potentially dangerous cars — especially those in the used-car market — are being caught and fixed. Many are overdue for a repair that could mean the difference between a safe car and a potential death trap.

And while the responsibility for ensuring that a car has been checked for recalls ultimately rests with individual owners, the current system doesn’t make the process easy.

Manufacturers send multiple letters to owners of affected cars in an effort to impress on them the seriousness of a car recall, but the letters don’t always connect with new owners when a car is sold. Some original owners flat-out ignore recall notices and don’t mention them to buyers. There is no law that requires a car’s owner to notify a potential buyer that the car he’s selling is the subject of a recall.

As of December 2011, General Motors’ “completion rate” for repairs under the two recalls was 52.5 percent. That’s well under what GM spokesman Alan Adler said is the typical completion rate of about 70 percent for one of the company’s recalls. That means that at best, 300,000 out of every 1 million GM vehicles recalled don’t get the appropriate repair. Some cars aren’t repaired because they already have been junked for various reasons before they are recalled. But in the case of the 2008 and ’09 engine fire recalls, GM’s latest data filed with NHTSA shows that more than 800,000 of the vehicles haven’t been repaired, and 131,128 of the recall letters — almost 8 percent — have not been delivered for various reasons.

Other automakers claim recall completion rates as high as 95 percent for specific campaigns, but none that Edmunds interviewed would follow GM’s lead and provide a composite completion rate for all of their recalls.

According to a study conducted in 2011 by Carfax, a company that sells vehicle history reports, the used-car market is rife with cars that are subject to recalls. There were “at least” 2.7 million vehicles listed for sale last year that still were subject to unfulfilled recalls, says Carfax spokesman Christopher Basso. The Carfax study only addresses cars being sold online. It doesn’t account for the cars sold each year through print ads or unadvertised private transactions.

Some car recalls target more minor matters, such as a recent one for a problem with the passenger-side windshield wiper motor in the 2012 Ford Focus. But many are very serious, targeting potential engine fires, driveshaft detachments and brake failures. In addition to the GM recall, for example, there are at least eight other recent ongoing passenger vehicle recalls in which a vehicle fire is a possible consequence of noncompliance, according to NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation, which conducts many of the studies that lead to recall orders. While many of the recalls involve cars that are just a few years old, others address models that were first sold a decade or more ago.

Tracking Down Owners
GM has been diligent in trying to track down the owners of the recalled cars involved in the 3.8-liter V6 case, says GM spokesman Adler. It has sent letters a dozen times over the past three years attempting to reach everyone who owns one of the vehicles involved in the recall. The company gets owner addresses from state vehicle registration records compiled by R.L. Polk, a private vendor.

Likewise, Ford has issued a series of recalls since 1999 that cover more than 16.6 million cars and trucks equipped with a potentially faulty cruise control switch that can overheat and cause a fire. Ford has sent several letters to owners, but while millions of the vehicles have been repaired as a result, there are almost as many that haven’t been fixed. In a recent filing with NHTSA, Ford reported that only 48 percent of the vehicles affected by the recall had been inspected or repaired.

Regulators and automakers worry constantly that not all of the vehicles will be repaired and that future owners might be caught unawares by severe problems, including car fires and brake and steering failures, that otherwise could have been prevented, says NHTSA spokesman Jose Uclés.

Meanwhile, NHTSA Administrator David Strickland told Edmunds, “A recall, by definition, means there is a problem that poses an unreasonable risk to safety. If it is not completed, the consumers are putting themselves at risk.” That’s why it’s important for everyone with a recalled vehicle to get the work done, he says.

Currently, NHTSA does not have the authority to require used-car sellers to disclose recalls or make recall repairs, Strickland said. “It’s a safety hole we are trying to close. The consumer should be well aware of a vehicle’s status at the time of purchase, whether from a used-car dealer, an individual or a car rental company.”

There have been previous attempts to use other avenues to catch recalled cars before they’re resold. Clarence Ditlow, head of the Washington D.C.-based Center for Auto Safety advocacy organization, said that he’s suggested in various forums over the years that the individual state motor vehicle departments could use the annual registration process to keep owners abreast of recall information by checking each VIN against automakers’ lists.

“They often say they will consider it, then nothing happens,” Ditlow complains. “Where there’s a will there’s a way; unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be a will.”

It’s not quite that easy, said Cathie Curtis, director of the vehicles program for the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators. The group represents DMV administrators and law enforcement agencies.

“It would require significant resources” in computer equipment and programming and personnel training at a time most state budgets are being pared, Curtis says.

She continues, “It would be quite costly for a state to take on such an effort. And there might also be a question of liability” if a state said it was going to be responsible for alerting people to recalls.

Cold Trails
Finding the present owner of a car that could be half a dozen or more years old can be difficult. And while it’s not impossible to find owners as long as the vehicle is registered, the cost and effort in continuing the search through the years to track down vehicles that haven’t been fixed is impractical. “You can only do so much,” says a spokesman for one major automaker that’s considered a leader in recall completions. (He asked not to be identified because his company — like most carmakers — doesn’t want to acknowledge that it doesn’t continue hunting down recalled cars until the last one is repaired.)

While automakers have the names and addresses of new-car buyers in their files, the trail often grows cold once the car has been sold by its original owner, especially in a private-party sale.

Given the long-term durability of modern vehicles, it’s not uncommon for a car to be sold two or three times, and that makes it especially difficult for manufacturers to track owners affected by a recall. While individual state motor vehicle departments have the names and addresses of the registered owners, there’s no requirement that a carmaker keep track of them by continuing to purchase annual registration lists from R.L. Polk or Equifax, the two companies that compile nationwide registration lists from data they buy from the state DMVs.

Also, original owners who move several times can get “lost” if the manufacturer doesn’t have updated address information. NHTSA documents show that hundreds of thousands of recall letters are undelivered by the postal service in most large recalls, usually because the address on the registration is wrong or the registered owner moved and didn’t leave a forwarding address.

Some owners even simply ignore recall notices, not realizing the potential danger. One writer who posted on the Edmunds forum bragged about it.

“I ignored all the recall notices sent to me by GM, and never had a problem,” the forum user wrote. “Sorry for all you guys that did. I can say that I always was VERY careful in adding oil and checking the oil, and any oil that dripped back on the engine I wiped it up with a paper napkin.”

Check Your Car
Because car recall notices can slip through the cracks, consumers should take a few minutes periodically to check if there are any outstanding recalls on the vehicles they own or are thinking about buying. And once a consumer has bought a used car, it’s a good idea to register it with the manufacturer via its Web site. That will put the car back into the recall-communication loop.

In most car recalls, not every vehicle that fits into the model and model-year designations is subject to the recall. There usually also are production date boundaries. For example, not every 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix with a 3.8-liter V6 is covered by the GM recall.

The unique vehicle identification number (VIN) is how manufacturers and NHTSA track cars and trucks subject to a recall. The VIN is listed on vehicle registration papers and is also stamped in various places on every car and truck. The most accessible VINs can be found in the upper left corner of the dashboard, usually visible through the windshield, and on a sticker typically placed on the driver-side doorjamb.

There are numerous ways to track down general recall information — including, of course, at least one app — but so far there are very few tools available to help consumers track down whether a specific vehicle was subject to a recall and whether the appropriate repairs were ever performed:

  • NHTSA: This agency is the official government record keeper for every recall, but it doesn’t yet track recalled vehicles via their VINs. NHTSA is developing a system that would enable consumers to use the government’s Safercar.gov Web site to run VIN checks, chief administrator Strickland tells Edmunds. But an agency spokesman could not tell Edmunds when such a system would be available for consumers to use. In any event, tracking vehicles by VIN when a recall is initiated would still remain the manufacturer’s job, Strickland says.

    Right now, Safercar.gov — NHTSA’s Web site — allows consumers to look up recalls by vehicle make, model and model year, using a series of drop-down menus. But they can’t use the site alone to find out if a vehicle is specifically one covered by a recall. What’s more, consumers can’t use the site to determine whether the appropriate repair has ever been done on a specific vehicle subject to a recall.

    Safercar.gov does allow consumers to receive notices of future recalls covering any vehicles you own. They can sign up to receive weekly e-mail notices of all vehicle recalls. The system also enables consumers to sign up for future recall alerts involving tires and child car seats.

    Car owners can also file safety-related complaints about vehicles through the site.

  • Edmunds.com: Our site provides a recall look-up service as part of its car maintenance guide. The Edmunds recall guide will check by make, model and year for recalls and technical service bulletins (TSBs). These bulletins often are called “secret warranties” and are sometimes used by manufacturers to tell dealership service departments to make repairs that aren’t serious enough to warrant a recall. The page also lists the manufacturer’s suggested maintenance schedule with estimated costs. It doesn’t, however, allow a check of a specific vehicle via its VIN.
  • Individual automakers: Car companies keep records of cars and trucks that were subject to a recall and were brought in to a franchised dealership to have the work done. One easy way to find out if a vehicle was subject to a recall and was repaired is to contact the automaker.

    Buyers and owners can do that by mail, via a dealership or by calling the manufacturer’s customer service line. There’s usually a contact number listed in the vehicle’s owner’s manual. Most automakers also have an online system for checking. Some, like Ford, Honda and Toyota, have opened those online systems to everyone, so shoppers can check out a used car before purchasing. Others, like GM, only offer the online VIN-check service to owners of their vehicles.

    The best way to start an online search for carmakers’ records is to put the make and model of a vehicle (“BMW 3 Series,” for example) and the word “recall” in an online search engine. It’s best to then scan the results for a link to the manufacturer’s special recall Web site. Often there’s no link to recall information from the manufacturer’s general Web site.

  • MyCarStats: The MyCarStats recall and safety-check site is a free online resource that makes NHTSA’s information easier to use. It neatly organizes and lists NHTSA recalls, consumer complaints, engineering investigations and technical service bulletins, providing synopses of each.

    Users can search the MyCarStats service by individual make-model-year parameters. The site also lists all recalls for 52 makes going back more than two decades and can be searched that way. What it doesn’t do is identify vehicles by VIN, so it can’t be used to tell if a specific car or truck was included in a recall and received the required repair recall work.

  • Carfax: The company has a recall site that’s unique in its ability to let owners or shoppers know whether a specific car or truck is subject to an open recall. Unfortunately, it doesn’t cover every manufacturer: Audi, BMW, Lexus, Toyota, Scion and Volkswagen vehicles are not included, for example. Carfax spokesman Basso said that carmakers usually cite proprietary reasons for not wanting to open their VIN files to Carfax. The company, however, “continues to talk” to automakers that aren’t yet sharing their VIN data, he said. For the many makes that are covered, users can enter a VIN and receive a Carfax report that either says there are no open recalls pertaining to the car or truck or identifies the pertinent recall.

    Basso says the company gets its information from manufacturers. That enables it to track down individual vehicles using the VIN, and determine whether the requested repair was ever performed by a manufacturer-designated service provider, typically a franchised dealer.

    He cautions that the report could show that there’s still an open recall on the vehicle if a repair has been done by an independent garage or other non-franchised service provider. He also cautions against having recall repair work done somewhere other than a factory-authorized service provider. That “could end up voiding the recall,” so that if the problem occurred after the work was done, the manufacturer would no longer be liable. It’s unusual for independent garages to do recall repair work, however, because they don’t get reimbursed for it.

Get It Done
NHTSA and manufacturers issue vehicle recalls to protect people from the harm and property damage that can be caused by a vehicle with a serious safety defect. It is clearly incumbent on manufacturers to try to reach every owner of every affected vehicle once a recall is issued. But it’s also clear that they don’t always succeed, especially when the cars and trucks being recalled are older and are likely to have been resold at least once.

Shoppers in the used-vehicle market should check out the recall status of vehicles they test-drive and that they might soon be parking in their garages. And longtime original owners should run a check of their cars and trucks as well, just to make sure there’s no old recall that was somehow missed. A few minutes of research could save a life.

Continue Reading »

0

Model 3800 Engine

  1. Model 3800 Engine
  2. 2003 Chevrolet Impala
  3. 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix

Sometimes the scope of automotive recalls can make it seem that every vehicle equipped with a particular part is suspect. But there might be no reason to panic if you’re driving a car that carries a part affected by another car’s recall.

The example of GM’s 2009 recall of 1.4 million cars with 3.8-liter V6 engines also carried in millions of other GM cars is similar to many other examples from other car companies.

Ford has issued a series of six recalls in the past decade that cover more than 14 million cars and trucks equipped with a potentially faulty cruise control switch that can short out and cause a fire. In March 2012, BMW announced a recall of 1.3 million 2003-’10 BMW 5 Series and 6 Series cars because a malfunctioning electrical system could lead to a fire.

That adds up to a lot of cars. But it pales in comparison to the number of vehicles that automakers sell in the U.S.: 182.3 million from 2000-’11 alone, according to Edmunds data.

GM built and installed more than 25 million of the 3800 model V6 engines in its vehicles between 1975 and 2008. The V6 was one of the company’s most popular engines for many years and is included on the Ward’s Automotive list of the best engines of the 20th century. Less than 6 percent are listed in the recall.

The vehicles covered by the GM engine recall were outfitted with the 3800 Series II design, manufactured between 1995 and 2004. They were identified in two phases. A 2008 recall of 207,000 vehicles applied only to turbocharged 1997-2003 Buick Regal and Pontiac Grand Prix models. The 2009 GM recall expanded the list to include more than 1.2 million normally aspirated versions of several GM models including the Grand Prix and Regal.

Here’s the full list:

  • 1997-2003 Buick Regal
  • 2000-’03 Chevrolet Impala
  • 1998-’99 Chevrolet Lumina
  • 1998-2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
  • 1998-’99 Oldsmobile Intrigue
  • 1997-2003 Pontiac Grand Prix

For both GM recalls, the danger comes from engine oil catching on fire after it has been spilled or leaked onto the hot surface of the exhaust manifold. If the oil catches fire, the flames can spread to plastic parts including the spark plug wiring channel and the upper intake manifolds and engine covers.

Continue Reading »

0

Vehicle Owner Questionnaire

  1. Vehicle Owner Questionnaire
  2. NHTSA Administrator David Strickland
  3. Recall Search Form

Vehicle manufacturers can voluntarily issue recalls, or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) can order them. Most car recalls are termed “voluntary” manufacturer recalls, but many have been prompted by NHTSA’s decision to investigate consumer complaints, according to NHTSA spokesman Jose Uclés.

Almost all car recalls are prompted by complaints that consumers make to the manufacturers or to NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation (ODI). Consumer advocates say that filing a complaint with ODI is the most effective way to ensure the matter is investigated. The process also is fairly easy. NHTSA even has an online form that allows consumers to write and file a report in just minutes.

If consumers file a sufficient number of complaints, or if a few complaints indicate a significant safety issue, NHTSA can take a series of investigative steps that can lead to a recall order. Edmunds.com outlines the process in “A Quick Guide to Recalls.”

Once NHTSA has determined the need for a car recall, federal law requires manufacturers to notify all registered owners and purchasers of the affected vehicles by registered mail. The notice must explain the potential safety hazards presented by the problem and instruct consumers on how to get the problem corrected. It also must inform consumers that the repairs are to be made at no charge and tell them when the fix will be available, how long it will take to perform and who to contact if there is a problem in obtaining the free recall work.

Almost all recalls are publicized via media releases from both NHTSA and the manufacturer. These releases go out weeks or even months before the manufacturer mails the individual owner notices. The media outreach is another effort to make sure that consumers whose mailing addresses might not be up to date know about recalls. Edmunds reports on major recalls weekly, via Inside Line news articles.

Sometimes, consumers get problems fixed and pay for the repairs before a manufacturer announces a recall. In most cases, if such consumers can present proper receipts, the automaker is required to provide reimbursement once a safety recall is issued. Usually, manufacturers are required to pay for safety-related repairs that were completed up to one year before the recall. But if NHTSA opened what’s called a formal “engineering analysis” more than a year prior to the recall, then the date on which that analysis was opened is the beginning of the term for eligible compensation.

While car recalls don’t have an expiration date, they are only enforced for “reasonable periods,” Uclés says. Basically, a recall is over if a vehicle’s manufacturer goes out of business, or if the parts needed to make the necessary repair are no longer being made.

NHTSA requires manufacturers to file quarterly progress reports showing how many of the affected vehicles have been inspected, how many were repaired and how many owners haven’t been reached. In cases where the agency determines that additional efforts to notify owners are needed, it can ask the manufacturer to send another round of letters. Many manufacturers voluntarily go far beyond that and use annual DMV registration lists acquired from two data companies, Polk and Equifax, to continue searching for vehicles that haven’t had the appropriate repairs. Spokesmen for both Honda and Toyota said their companies in some cases have even set up phone banks to call owners of vehicles involved in recalls.

There also is a limit on how far back a manufacturer has to go to fix problems without charging the owner. Vehicles eligible for no-cost repair can’t be more than 10 years old as of the date the defect was determined. So a recall ordered this year would only reach back to cars sold new from 2003 onward. There is a more complete list of rules on NHTSA’s recall process site.

Continue Reading »

0

Smoking 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP

  1. Smoking 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
  2. Firefighters and 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
  3. 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP Fire

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says that car recalls never really die. Once issued, they are in force as long as the manufacturer remains in business and parts are available to repair the vehicles involved.

As far as an individual vehicle is concerned, the manufacturer considers its job done once the required recall repair has been performed.

But if a problem continues or recurs after a car recall repair, consumers might be up a creek.

When Trouble Persists
In the case of the GM recall of cars with 3.8-liter V6s that are potentially susceptible to engine fires, a number of car owners have complained on Edmunds forums that even though they received a recall notice and had the required repair work done, they later lost the car to an engine fire anyway.

One woman reported experiencing two fires in two years. The second occurred after she and her father had performed do-it-yourself repairs to get the car running after the first fire.

Jorge Chica, a New York-based customer-service specialist for a cell phone company, says his 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP caught fire in his parking lot at work just a few weeks ago, more than three years after he’d taken it in to a local GM dealership in 2008 to have the recall work done.

“I bought it in 2007 from my best friend. He was the original owner so I knew how well it had been taken care of,” Chica tells Edmunds. “I drove it regularly as my commuter car, 76 miles a day on the highway, and had no problems until the fire. It was always a good, reliable car.”

On the day of the fire, Chica had driven from his office to an auto parts store at lunch to pick up a new side mirror for the Pontiac. “I came back from lunch and parked and went into my office and sat down and a co-worker ran by and said there was a car out in the lot that was smoking like it was on fire. I went over to the window and looked out and saw white smoke coming from under the hood of my car.”

Chica called the fire department and was walking toward his car when the smoke turned “all black and flames started coming out.” By the time the fire was extinguished, the front of the Pontiac “was just incinerated, and the car parked next to mine was damaged, too,” he said.

His liability insurance paid to repair his co-worker’s damaged car, but Chica didn’t carry comprehensive on a car he’d bought for $3,000, so he wasn’t able to file a claim for his own loss. “It was towed away to a storage yard, and later I signed it over to them for disposal so I wouldn’t have to pay the daily storage fees.”

It is not clear what recourse car owners have in such cases. GM spokesman Alan Adler said that most fires are “due to other causes related to the age of the vehicles and [to] maintenance practices.” A fire in a vehicle that had been repaired under a recall “would need to work with a GM dealer to determine if the issue was related to the repair procedure.” He said that state statutes of limitations control the length of time a consumer has to make a claim.

Proving that the fire was caused by the same circumstances that prompted the recall is often difficult. In the case of the GM recall, many of the cars involved in the most recent fires were purchased for relatively little money and the owners, like Chica, found it cheaper to have the car junked than store it until the cause of the fire could be established.

Continue Reading »